Poppies in the Moat: Tower of London 31.10.14

poppy 1

Poppies in the Moat at the Tower of London by Paul Cummins and Tom Piper

Paul Cummins' installation is an example of how poppies have become a backdoor expression of a nationalism that might otherwise be unacceptable, says Edwin Heathcote

Tower Hill is thronged with people. You can barely exit the tube station and announcements inside warn against using it at all. The cause? 888,246 poppies making the Tower of London's moat into a carpet of red. This is installation art as populist spectacle, the tropes of the art gallery poured out into the public realm to mingle with mawkish sentimentality, charity and a jingoistic celebration of the armed forces.

The installation, if we can call it that, is the work of ceramic artist Paul Cummins (whose oeuvre seems to comprise entirely of ceramic flowers, plus a few bowls with flowers on) and stage designer Tom Piper. It is, admittedly visually striking, but it is also unsettling for all the wrong reasons.

All memorials are, inevitably, aestheticisations, but there is something about the ubiquity of the poppy as a prettification of one of the most gruesome conflicts of the modern age that galls. It chimes with a curious moment in the British popular imagination in which the people have turned on politicians, but seem to revere the armed forces in an unthinking way. The war wounded have become contemporary martyrs for a post-religious society and the poppies are the mass religious experience, the coming together in common cause, that society lacks in other fields.

poppy 4

The commemoration and celebration of the war dead has become a genuine bottom-up expression of popular culture. The huge displays of respect to soldiers returning as corpses at Wootton Bassett saw the unlikely line up of Hells Angels beside blazered-veterans and England-shirted football fans in a UKIP-ish display of nationalism.

Other European countries are commemorating the war dead of all sides (a new memorial to all the Great War dead at Arras by architect Philippe Prost will be inaugurated by François Hollande, Angela Merkel and David Cameron on Armistice day), yet Britain persists with its own narrow, nationalist remembrance – a covert celebration of victory and superiority under the guise of "never forgetting".

There is something here of Guy Debord's Society of the Spectacle, the substitution of the spectacular for the real. The media balks at showing bodies and the realities of war; instead we have its representation as a thing of beauty, a field of flowers. Debord writes of a society that prefers the sign to the thing signified, representation to reality.

Through the medium of the art installation, the language of Ai Wei Wei's hand-painted ceramic sunflower seeds, these poppies have become a backdoor expression of a nationalism that might otherwise be unacceptable: a glorification of war and sacrifice in the guise of sentimental memory.

Just as it is inconceivable for a politician to not wear a poppy (he or she would be deliberately disrespecting the memory of the sacred dead, a cardinal sin), so this fake flower has become a cipher for a popular nationalism, a rebuff to Europe and a potent symbol of imagined glory. It is a freighted flower, a fake flower lost in a sea of simulacra. There is something unsettlingly fascist about this image of the individual subsumed into the field, the expectation of the poppy as a sartorial symbol of expected respect. If remembrance is enforced it becomes something else, a compulsory false memory.

Adolf Loos famously asserted that only a very small part of architecture belonged to art, the tomb and the monument. Perhaps it is time to question whether a memorial like this – a fleeting borrowing from the tropes of installation, spectacle and the gallery floor – can ever really belong to art.

Do you think that Paul Cummins' poppy installation is a glorification of war in the guise of sentimental memory or a fitting memorial for the lives lost during the war? Respond using the comment box below

 

Words

Edwin Heathcote

quotes story

There is something unsettlingly fascist about this image of the individual subsumed into the field, , the expectation of the poppy as a sartorial symbol of expected respect

5 comments

  • Comment Link Ali Welch Tuesday, 11 November 2014 10:09 posted by Ali Welch

    Reading this article actually made me angry. Whilst I agree that there are some uncomfortable aspects to 'poppy-mania' the tone here is alarmingly sniping and snobbish.

    I found the phrase "The installation, if we can call it that" especially troubling. The work is installation both artistically and literally; the fact that the public have engaged with it in such numbers is a wonderful thing.

    This article has nothing to do with sensitive debate around the nature of remembrance and everything to do with a suspicion of the mass and popular taste.

    Report
  • Comment Link Yvonne Jones Thursday, 06 November 2014 20:33 posted by Yvonne Jones

    How cynical am interpretation. Poppies are a reminder of what was lost in a struggle to be free. To live freely, think freely and have freedom of speech . They are a gratitude to loved ones, recent and less recent ancestors. Grayson Perry made the point about the Loyalists whose loyalty is to an outdated sense of Britain . This installation is not that. It's a lets have no more wars, terrorist threat, intolerances. I will wear my poppy in remembrance for those my family lost, then and now. The most recent a nephew in Afghanistan.

    Report
  • Comment Link Sam Cork Thursday, 06 November 2014 17:29 posted by Sam Cork

    So what is wrong with nationalism?
    What is wrong with remembering the soldiers, making them heroes and vilifying the politicians that send them to war?
    None of the people that I know have seen the installation think it glorifies war or find it sentimental. Would the writer prefer we show hideously maimed dead bodies as a memorial rather than (the prettification of a gruesome conflict) with poppies?
    It seems that when art becomes populist that art critics immediately become very snobbish and feel they have to knock the art.

    Report
  • Comment Link christine Thursday, 06 November 2014 17:16 posted by christine

    I have been to see it and it is a timely reminder of the huge losses suffered by families. I see nothing wrong in that.

    Report
  • Comment Link Elizabeth Alcock Thursday, 06 November 2014 17:09 posted by Elizabeth Alcock

    Perhaps Paul might research his family tree for a WW1 veteran...each poppy (and I've 'planted' a few ... represents one dead combatant. I my case, a Great Uncle and his horse. Yes, I am too young to have know him but, now I live far from the family memorial, this is a thoughtful art instillation. Is it art? Of course it is, the people have voted. Their opinion counts.

    Report

Leave a comment

Click to show